On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:16 AM, John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> wrote:
> 
> On 9/27/2016 12:06 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> That helps for one-time stat collection, but as I mentioned in my original 
>> message, since connections may not last long, I could be getting close to, 
>> or even hitting, my connection limit while still getting values back from 
>> those that show plenty of connections remaining, depending on how often I 
>> checked.
>> 
>> I guess what would be ideal in my mind is that whenever Postgresql logged an 
>> opened/closed connection, it also looked the *total* number of open 
>> connections at that time. I don't think that's possible, however :-)
> 
> if you stick pgbouncer in front of postgres (with a pool for each 
> user@database), I believe you CAN track the max connections via pgbouncer's 
> pool stats.

Ahh! If so, that alone would be reason enough for using pgbouncer. Thanks!

-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------


> 
> 
> -- 
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to