On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com> wrote: > As a developer I want it to "just work", if there's an error of any kind then > abort the transaction, just as it was non-deferrable.
Everybody wants everything to "just work", for their own ( in a lot of cases unspecified even to the themselves ) definition of JW. Developers normally want to be told what "just work" means when developing something. That been said, I'm not sure making it ( deferred constraint act like immediate ones during upserts ) work is even a good idea. If it can be conditionally enabled with a simple set and implemented in very few ( < 20 ) lines of code, ok for me , otherwise I would prefer the reduced bug surface. Francisco Olarte. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
