På onsdag 24. august 2016 kl. 18:36:16, skrev Francisco Olarte < fola...@peoplecall.com <mailto:fola...@peoplecall.com>>: On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh >> Are there any plans to lift this restriction? > I'm trying to figure out a method for making this work in my head. > These two things seem kind of opposed to each other.
He probably wants to just treat is as non-deferrable just during the upsert. I do not know if he has thought this opens a can of worms ( like, the constraint may be already broken due to precious DML ). Francisco Olarte. As a developer I want it to "just work", if there's an error of any kind then abort the transaction, just as it was non-deferrable. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
