Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Greg Navis <cont...@gregnavis.com> wrote:
>> I'm curious ... would it be difficult to modify PostgreSQL so that it'd use
>> the index for `similarity(lhs, rhs) >= show_limit()` too?
> Yes, that would be very difficult. The project has kind of painted
> itself into a corner on that.
Well, the thing that is not easy to change is that index scans require
qualifiers expressed as "indexed_column indexable_operator something".
But there's a lot of flexibility about what "something" is. You could
imagine doing, say,
foo ~~ similarity_rhs('bar', 0.01)
where the function just collects its arguments into some composite type
that we provide an indexable operator to compare strings to.
> If it were easy, I doubt we would have added the % operator with the
> ugly set_limit() wart in the first place (although I was not around at
> the time that was done--maybe there were other considerations).
I think that was just bad design. There's a lot of old stuff in contrib
that hasn't been vetted all that closely.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
