On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:21 AM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net > <mailto:isr...@ravnalaska.net>> wrote: > > > > > It'll kill your performance, but if aesthetics are that important to you... > > They're not *that* important. I was just asking if there was a way to do this > easily. > > While the performance argument might be true it is heavily dependent upon > concurrency. I'm doubting a PO system in the typical company has enough > concurrency, and is sensitivity enough to small delays, that giving up the > benefit of sequential numbering would be a worthwhile trade-off.
I'm thinking the same - especially considering that we aren't exactly a huge company. > > David J. > ----------------------------------------------- Israel Brewster Systems Analyst II Ravn Alaska 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7293 -----------------------------------------------
