On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net> wrote:
> > > > > It'll kill your performance, but if aesthetics are that important to > you... > > They're not *that* important. I was just asking if there was a way to do > this easily. > While the performance argument might be true it is heavily dependent upon concurrency. I'm doubting a PO system in the typical company has enough concurrency, and is sensitivity enough to small delays, that giving up the benefit of sequential numbering would be a worthwhile trade-off. David J.
