On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:51:15AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:49:43AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Bruce, > > > > * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:43:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 06:10:15PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > > > The first is required or anyone who has done that will get the funny > > > > > error that started this thread and things won't work anyway, but I > > > > > believe the latter is also necessary to patch and back-patch as it > > > > > could > > > > > lead to data loss. It's not a high potential as, hopefully, people > > > > > will > > > > > check first, but I can imagine a hosting provider or environments > > > > > where > > > > > there are lots of independent clusters not catching this issue in > > > > > their > > > > > testing, only to discover someone set their database to 'datallowconn > > > > > = > > > > > false' for whatever reason and now that database is gone... > > > > > > > > Agreed. I will work on a patch for this. > > > > > > Attached is a patch that implements this, and it should be backpatch to > > > all versions. > > > > Excellent and agreed. Just looked through the patch and didn't do a > > full review, but it looks good to me. > > OK, thanks. I will apply it all branches later today as it is a data > loss bug.
Patch applied back through 9.0. Thanks for the report and analysis. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
