On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:24 AM, pinker [via PostgreSQL] < ml-node+s1045698n583786...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Ok, but in this particular case I don't see any caveats You mean other than the infinite recursion, right? and think that could be classic case for rule to be used. > If it is "almost never the correct solution" why rules still exists at > all? > Backward compatibility, the "almost", and the fact that views use rules as an implementation mechanism. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/infinite-recursion-detected-in-rules-for-relation-tp5837697p5837871.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
