User created rules are almost never the correct solution. There are too many cavets and views can accomplish nearly everything that a user might want.
David J. On Friday, February 13, 2015, pinker [via PostgreSQL] < ml-node+s1045698n583782...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > hmm I wanted to show only rows that was inserted today, so instead of > who='me' wanted to filter for instance where timestamp_column=CURRENT_DATE. > > Yes, a view would be a solution but I thouhgt that's the case rules were > made for? Isn't it? > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://postgresql.nabble.com/infinite-recursion-detected-in-rules-for-relation-tp5837697p5837822.html > To unsubscribe from infinite recursion detected in rules for relation, click > here > <http://postgresql.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5837697&code=ZGF2aWQuZy5qb2huc3RvbkBnbWFpbC5jb218NTgzNzY5N3wtMzI2NTA0MzIx> > . > NAML > <http://postgresql.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/infinite-recursion-detected-in-rules-for-relation-tp5837697p5837859.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
