---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Nolan <htf...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:48:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? To: Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We've talked about teaching the master to keep track of how far back > all of its known standbys are, and retaining WAL back to that specific > point, rather than the shotgun approach that is wal_keep_segments. > It's not exactly clear what the interface to that should look like, > though. > > Moreover, how does the database decide when to drop a known standby from the queue because it has failed or the DBA notify the database that a particular standby should no longer be included? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
