> Why would you not want to maintain a WAL archive? Are you depending on
> the
> slave server(s) as your only form of backup?
If the slave devide acts as a perfect backup, why would I need an additional
3rd entiy for WAL backups?
I know what the difference between sync and async is, but I don't see the need
for a WAL archive in sync mode. Can you please explain that? Thanks
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:54:54 -0400
> Von: Michael Nolan <htf...@gmail.com>
> An: hans wulf <lo...@gmx.net>
> CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] 9.1.3 Standby catchup mode
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:35 PM, hans wulf <lo...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > I am wondering how the catchup mode of a hot synchron slave server works
> > on 9.1.3 if there is no WAL archive.
> >
>
>
> It isn't clear what you want from synchronous streaming replication, or if
> you understand the difference between synchronous streaming replication
> and
> asynchronous streaming replication.
> --
> Mike Nolan
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
