On 6 March 2012 18:20, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bosco Rama <postg...@boscorama.com> writes: >> Thom Brown wrote: >>> I've done that a couple times, but no effect. I think Tom's point >>> about a filesystem bug is probably right. > >> Have you rebooted since this started? There may be a process that is >> holding the pid file 'deleted but present' until the process terminates. > > Even if something is holding the file open, that wouldn't prevent unlink > from removing the directory entry for it; or even if we were talking > about a badly-designed filesystem that failed to follow standard Unix > semantics, that wouldn't explain why the directory entry is apparently > visible to some operations but not others. > > Still, I agree with your point: Thom should reboot and see if the > misbehavior is still there, because that would be useful info for his > bug report.
After a reboot, initdb completes successfully. I don't think it performed an fsck of any kind as I don't see it in the logs. -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
