On 1 December 2011 04:00, David Johnston <pol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2011, at 18:44, Craig Ringer <ring...@ringerc.id.au> wrote: > >> On 11/30/2011 10:32 PM, Sergey Konoplev wrote: > Insert into tbl values(...); [times 50] > insert into tbl values (...), (...), (...), ...; [ once with 50 values ] > Copy [ with 50 input rows provided ] > > I would presume the first one is badly performing but no idea whether the > multi-value version of insert would be outperformed by an equivalent Copy > command (both on the main query and during replication) > > Though, does auto-commit affect the results in the first case; I.e., without > auto-commit do the first two results replicate equivalently?
So the guaranteed solutions are either BEGIN; INSERT INTO table1 VALUES (...), (...), ...; COMMIT; or COPY FROM ...; correct? > >> > David J -- Sergey Konoplev Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp JID/GTalk: gray...@gmail.com Skype: gray-hemp -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
