Thanx brad, i think 9.0 would be the most wise decision for the time being.
Στις Thursday 16 June 2011 18:29:16 γράψατε: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general- > > ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Jaskiewicz > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:05 AM > > To: Achilleas Mantzios > > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ? > > > > It could be worth considering 9.1. Probably by the time you get > > production ready version, 9.1 will be already stable (few months I > > guess). > > The usual answer to that question is - it will be ready when its ready. > > > > I would also ask, what is your (and your managements) tolerance for risk, and > do you actually need any of the new features and/or performance benefits in > 9.1? > > Postgres does have an excellent track record for quality and stability with > new releases, but a couple of months in the field isn't really considered > stable in most places. > > Brad. > -- Achilleas Mantzios -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
