On 15 Jan 2011, at 23:52, Randall Smith wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've created a trigger that checks the uniqueness of two columns in a
> table.  Traditionally, one would use a unique constraint, but in my
> case, the size of the unique index would be too large and some
> performance loss is acceptable.

But you already do have an index on that id-field, so what's the problem with 
using a unique constraint? Its unique index could just replace the existing one.

Alban Hertroys

--
Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling.


!DSPAM:737,4d323b1e11871071717716!



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to