2010/10/14 Massa, Harald Armin <c...@ghum.de> > Dmitriy, > >> >> Again, I suggest PQlibVersion() or PQversion() instead of >> PQlibpqVersion(). >> >> Why this "pq" redundancy in name? Waste of bytes. >> >> the first PQ qualifies the name-space "those are PostgresQl functions". > the library is called libpq, and we are explicitly asking for the version > of libpq; not of any other library that may or may not be connected with > libpq > If "PQ" is "namespace", so PQlibVersion() will never conflict with other libraries.
> > (in some compilations there is linkage to some system libraries, which have > versions of their own. in other implementations there are wrappers around > the libpq-libraray, which have their own version to. Oh, and there is > open-ssl which may be mixed into the whole party) > > So 2 bytes of source-code / linker redundancy in times where smartphones > sport 12Gigabyte should be payed.... > > I don't worry about source-code or linker. I want correctness. Why libpq does not have PQlibpqConnect() ? How about other libraries linked to libpq ? Waste of bytes. Harald > -- > GHUM GmbH > Harald Armin Massa > Spielberger Straße 49 > 70435 Stuttgart > 0173/9409607 > > Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971 > - > persuadere. > et programmare > -- // Dmitriy.
