On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:23 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> This is really something that psycopg2 should work out for you. I >> suggest you take up a discussion on this on their mailing list. > > ...which is down over the last 3 weeks or so: > > http://www.initd.org/
In addition, I posted a patch for 9.0 support which was supposed to be rolled in to psycopg2 weeks ago. Now I am stuck pushing my own psycopg2 egg around. The psycopg2 project is too reliant on one person (who has trouble managing his servers)- I wish he would move the project to a public project management service. I also remember a discussion on the poor state of postgresql drivers for python and which driver the PostgreSQL project should endorse- it looks like the situation has not improved. Here's the thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00351.php Cheers, M -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
