> > What's nice about PostgreSQL is that, while it hasn't always had > > every SQL92 feature (like outer joins, etc.), it seems to have less > > legacy, nonstandard stuff wired in. :-) > > Oh man, you have noooo idea. PostgreSQL is legacy headquarters. ;-) Yes, yes, I know about *some* of them [8k limit springs to mind!] (C hackers no doubt no *lots* more.) But, in terms of, "as comes out in our SQL syntax", compared to Oracle, we're free and clear. -- Joel Burton, Director of Information Systems -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support Center of Washington (www.scw.org)
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Joel Burton
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Igor V. Rafienko
- RE: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Joel Burton
- SV: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Jarmo Paavilainen
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Jan Wieck
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgre Joe Kislo
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgr... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Po... fabrizio . ermini
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgr... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Postgr... Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Po... Sandeep Joshi
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Po... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Unanswered questions about Po... Peter T Mount