On Wednesday 17 February 2010 8:13:51 pm Jayadevan M wrote: > Hi, > I was reading about oid and default configuration of PostgreSQL. A couple > of doubts > 1) Why is use of OIDS considered deprecated? Is there something else that > can be used in place of oids for user tables?
Sequences: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-createsequence.html > 2) Is there a performance impact if we keep the default default_with_oids > to ON? > Googling, I came across this - > http://philmcrew.com/oid.html > But most of the links given at that page were broken and the page itself > did not provide a lot of information. The primary question that needs to be asked is what do you want to do with them? It is not so much a performance issue as an admin issue. OIDs where created for Postgres internal system use and leaked out to user space. As a result they have some shortcomings as detailed in the above article. Given that sequences are available as number generators, it was decided to encourage/force OIDs to be for internal system use only. That decision is set and using OIDs on user tables is setting yourself for future problems. > Thanks, > Jayadevan > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
