Stuart Bishop wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Alban Hertroys > <dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > A similar issue was discussed just recently here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-09/msg01219.php > > > > That issue involved cursors though (and a serializable isolation level, but > > you have that). Do you have any triggers that use cursors on the table that > > the update fails for? > > There is a trigger on that table, and it is certainly the culprit as > can be seen here (different table, same trigger): I don't think the committed patch touches anything involved in what you're testing, but if you could grab CVS tip from the 8.4 branch (or the snapshot from ftp.postgresql.org:/pub/snapshot/stable/8.4 ) and give it a try, that'd be great. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
