On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Robert James<srobertja...@gmail.com> wrote: > UNION was better, but still 5 times as slow as either query done > individually. > set enable_seqscan=off didn't help at all - it was totally ignored > Is there anything else I can do?
Did you try union, or union all? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
