Hi! > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Glyn Astill [mailto:glynast...@yahoo.co.uk] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 12:33 > An: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Markus Wollny
> The first thing I would have done if I've been forced to do > that (if there was no other option?) would be a dump / > restore directly afterwards, then pick through for any > inconsistencies. That's a lot of data - somewhere around 43GB at the moment. And pg_dump seems to fail altogether on the affected databases, so the pg_clog issue actually means that I cannot make any current backups. > Probably wait for the big-wigs to reply but perhaps a reindex > may get you going. Tried that, but it also makes PostgreSQL crash, so no luck there either. I also dropped template0, recreated it from template1, did a VACUUM FREEZE on it, marked it as template again and disallowed connections. > I'd definately be starting with a fresh database once I got > out of the whole though... Yes, but that'll be a nightshift and I need some way to actually get at a working dump now... Kind regards Markus Jede Stimme zählt, jetzt voten für die besten Games: www.bamaward.de Computec Media AG Sitz der Gesellschaft und Registergericht: Fürth (HRB 8818) Vorstandsmitglieder: Albrecht Hengstenberg (Vorsitzender) und Rainer Rosenbusch Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Jürg Marquard Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer: DE 812 575 276 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
