As I read it, he is supportive of the community process that PG follows; I am not so sure he promotes Postgres though :)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Long wrote: > > Greg Smith wrote: > > > I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for > > > reference in case it gets forcibly removed... > > > > > > Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant > > > a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have > > > guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for > > > me? > > > > > > -- > > > * Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, > MD > > > > > I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have > > transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was > > looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions. > > > > I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL. > > Monty is quite supportive of Postgres. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
