Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a
2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed
that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have
transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking
for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.
"Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with
PostgreSQL. :)
It's free. The pgsql community, however, is priceless.
No doubt. The pgsql community rocks. In fact the support on this
mailing list is top notch and free. :)
Thank you a million times over to anyone that has give me advice here.
I have never gotten bad advice from this list.
