On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Michael Shulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be possible to actually do something like this in an update > rule? You couldn't write the "begin/commit", but it seems that you > wouldn't need to either, since the UPDATE command invoking the rule > will be wrapped in its own begin/commit (automatic or explicit).
Thats a good question. I've never tried it. and since then, I gotten away from using update-able view. In my case, I like using Natural Primary keys so update-able views wouldn't work for me any more. :o) -- Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. Visit the Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG) http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
