On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:43:05PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:46:14PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > Yes, I know about tagged types but have shyed away from them
> > so far courtesy of them not being adjustable after the fact.
>
> What do you mean by this? Adjustable in what way?
This
svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/taggedtypes.html
is currently down for me but Google has a cache. I was
probably wrongly remembering this:
When you delete a tagged type some cruft is left behind
(not in the system catalog though).
Perhaps I confuse this with some limitation of a previous
implementation of the enum type. Also perhaps I was
misguided into thinking tags cannot be modified by the
"don't delete from table of tags" part.
> Truly, taggedtypes are a really useful feature but I think the chance
> of them being in the main tree approximatly nil, which is enough reason
> to stay away from them.
Agree. Another one is non-indexability which I'd truly need.
> > Should I be using a custom domain for this ?
>
> You just need to store the pair (time,zone), I don't think domains are
> flexible enough for that. A complex type maybe (but then you've just
> reinvented taggedtypes, inefficiently :) )
Which I'd rather avoid.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
