> My mistake! ;-) > I remember wondering who would ever need more that the 16K that > the Sinclair Spectrum could give you! To go back to my original point about putting things in perspective - increasing this by 2^32 would give you 68 terabytes of RAM. But if we can get rid of oid's altogether then I think that would be best. (At least we can make our own 64 bit serial types until they are officially implemented). - Andrew
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? brad
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Prasanth A. Kumar
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Mathieu Arnold
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Dave Burbidge