Chris Bitmead wrote: > > Any complex scheme to solve this seems like a waste of time. In a couple > of years when you are likely to be running out, you'll probably be > upgrading your computer to a 64bit one with a newer version of postgres, > and then the problem will disappear. that's the kind of thing people said about y2k, isn't it ? -- Mathieu Arnold
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Paul Caskey
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? brad
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Prasanth A. Kumar
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Bradley Kieser
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Andrew Snow
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Mathieu Arnold
- Re: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: [GENERAL] 4 billion record limit? Dave Burbidge