am Tue, dem 28.08.2007, um 14:23:00 +0200 mailte Kamil Srot folgendes: > > Kynn Jones wrote: > >I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with. > > I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an > >collection of a few hundred much smaller "parallel databases", all > >having the same schema. What I mean by this is that, as far as the > >intended use of this particular system there are no meaningful queries > >whose results would include information from more than one of these > > I don't have experience in this type of application, but we use pgsql > partitioning for other reasons > and it has some of the features you want (data separation, query > performance, ...). > It can be worth reading: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html
He don't need table partitioning, this is a different thing. Andreas -- Andreas Kretschmer Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header) GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org/
