Don Baccus wrote:
> At 11:32 AM 2/22/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >I see no way that allowing the transaction to commit after an overflow
> >can be called consistent with the spec.
>
> You are absolutely right. The whole point is that either a) everything
> commits or b) nothing commits.
>
> Having some kinds of exceptions allow a partial commit while other
> exceptions rollback the transaction seems like a very error-prone
> programming environment to me.
>
It is hard to believe all world is wrong and only we are right. Isn't it ?
;)
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
> Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
> http://donb.photo.net.
>
> ************
--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************
