Pawel Veselov <pawel.vese...@gmail.com> writes: > Was trying to import a database from a cloud deployment, and ran into this.
> Exported the database with: > * pg_dump (PostgreSQL) 12.20 (Ubuntu 12.20-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) > * RDS PostgreSQL 12.19 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) > 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-12), 64-bit > This produced a dump file of version 1.16, at least according to 'file'. Better take another look at which pg_dump you used. Archive version 1.16 was introduced in PG v17, according to a quick look at the source code. pg_restore versions older than v17 are not going to understand it. > I'm not sure whether the server has any say in the version of the dump > file, I assume it doesn't. Nope, just pg_dump. > So, how come older software (according to versions) produces dump > files with a greater version > than the newer software can understand? Is this Ubuntu package > maintainers messing things up? You'd have to ask them. > Given a pg_dump, it would be nice if its "-V" output would say which > version of the dump it would produce, > and a pg_restore - what's the max (and min, if that's a thing) version > of the dump that it will accept. Hmm, maybe. The original thought was that the archive version would seldom be a limiting factor: it describes the file format but not the SQL inside the file, and that's often version-specific too. So in general we don't promise that pg_dump version N will produce output that you can use with pg_restore or server versions less than N, whether they share the same archive version or not. regards, tom lane