Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I think if we want to improve how this code is seen by the compiler by
> modifying it, we should just remove the NULL/NIL assignments. It's a
> pretty arbitrary (and rather small) subset of fields being initialized,
> fields which very obviously have been zeroed by memset already, so I
> don't see any value in the explicit assignments.
I have to concede that it's unclear why we're filling just these
fields explicitly and not any others. We're at least consistent:
all the callers of select_rtable_names do it the same way.
regards, tom lane
