> On 22 May 2024, at 13:00, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> I think if we want to improve how this code is seen by the compiler by > modifying it, we should just remove the NULL/NIL assignments. *If* the optimization is measurable, IMHO. > It's a > pretty arbitrary (and rather small) subset of fields being initialized, > fields which very obviously have been zeroed by memset already, so I > don't see any value in the explicit assignments. My personal opinion is that there is value in immediately knowing the type of the members from the inits, in this case I know without looking up the definition that some of the members are list. I like that readability. That being said, I for sure won't fight if there is concensus to remove. -- Daniel Gustafsson
