On 2021-10-28 21:14:53 -0400, Mladen Gogala wrote: > On 10/28/21 18:07, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > I think everybody agrees that incremental backup per database, and not > cluster-wide, is nice, and it would be nice if PG supported it. But, given > the way PG is architectured, having cluster-wide WALs, that's not an easy > task to implement. > > I am not advocating for the database level incremental backups, but all > databases that have it also have cluster wide/instance wide WAL logs. Cluster > wide WAL logs do not make database level incremental backups hard. Both Oracle > and DB2 have database level incremental backups and both have cluster wide WAL > (redo or logs).
I was not aware that Oracle even has something equivalent to a Postgres cluster.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | h...@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
