On 10/28/21 10:51, Ron wrote:
Except we have no way of knowing what the situation is. I prefer not
to assume a context.
You make it sound like incremental (and differential) backups are some
complicated thing that needs context. That's utter and complete rubbish
in every Enterprise RDBMS except Postgresql.
This is Postgres so we do need context.
Also you have not defined what you consider incremental backup? I for
one would put this:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/continuous-archiving.html
forward as a candidate.
Something like "BACKUP DATABASE (DIFFERENTIAL) foo TO foo.bak;" should
be a fundamental feature of every RDBMS that claims to be enterprise class.
Knock your self out:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
