>There is more than one type of statistics though. Stats on the distribution of >data is easily recreated with analyze table_name or analyzing the whole >>database. What about the stats on how many rows have been inserted or updated >since the last (auto)vacuum and that will be used to trigger autovacuum? >Are >those set back to zero by an upgrade? I would assume usage counts like how >many times an index scan has been done would be reset, but if the >numbers in >pg_stat_user_tables like n_tup_upd or n_tup_del are zero'd out during an >upgrade, than it would seem like a manual vacuum would always be a >good idea >to ensure a table wasn't 99% of the way to needing one and then the stats got >reset by upgrading.
I agree @Michael Lewis<mailto:mle...@entrata.com>, thank you for this comment. I am thinking a vacuum full is what I am going to need. Or pg_dump / pg_restore. I have tuned auto vacuum after the upgrade to be aggressive, it finishes fine after a couple hours on a large table, statistics look good on the pg_stat_user_tables. However, when I run the bloat check from the wiki https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Show_database_bloat it still shows bloat. Thinking it may be left over from before the pg_upgrade and auto vacuum tuning. Best, Jason Ralph From: Michael Lewis <mle...@entrata.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:02 PM To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> Cc: Jason Ralph <jra...@affinitysolutions.com>; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_upgrade —link does it remove table bloat There is more than one type of statistics though. Stats on the distribution of data is easily recreated with analyze table_name or analyzing the whole database. What about the stats on how many rows have been inserted or updated since the last (auto)vacuum and that will be used to trigger autovacuum? Are those set back to zero by an upgrade? I would assume usage counts like how many times an index scan has been done would be reset, but if the numbers in pg_stat_user_tables like n_tup_upd or n_tup_del are zero'd out during an upgrade, than it would seem like a manual vacuum would always be a good idea to ensure a table wasn't 99% of the way to needing one and then the stats got reset by upgrading. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
