On 2019-04-03 13:12:56 +0400, rihad wrote: > Ideally VACUUM FULL should not require a giant lock on the table. [...] > Since rewriting a table is a completely internal operation from > clients' POV, hopefully one day we will see a concurrent version of > vacuum full.
There are (at least) pg_repack and pg_squeeze. It would be nice to have
that in the core, though.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated
| | | h...@hjp.at | management tools.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
