On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:31 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:16 PM James Sewell <james.sew...@jirotech.com> > wrote: > >> Here's a starter patch that shows one of the approaches discussed. It > >> gets WSL users to a better place than they were before, by suppressing > >> further warnings after the first one. > > > > This wasn't quite right, updated to check erro for ENOSYS (not rc) > > > > This compiles and stops the panic on WSL (with a single warning). > > > > I haven't tested if a version compiled on Linux will behave the same way - > > but based on the error messages in the top post it looks like the behavior > > is the same. > > Great. Thanks for testing, and for the fix! Well that all sounds > like good news: it corrects the behaviour from 11.2, and also improves > on the previous behaviour which I'd have accepted as a bug if anyone > had reported it. So the next problem is that we don't have a > consensus on whether this is the right approach, so I don't feel like > I can commit it yet. Does any want to make another concrete proposal?
Ok, here's the version I'm planning to push soon if there are no objections. Re-adding Bruce to the thread, as I just noticed the CC list got pruned at some point in this thread. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
0001-Tolerate-ENOSYS-failure-from-sync_file_range-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
