"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Battuello, Louis <
> louis.battue...@etasseo.com> wrote:
>> So, user_2 needs usage on the schema containing its newly owned reference
>> table even though user_1 is performing the insert on a table in the other
>> schema? Interesting. I though the validation was only dependent on user_1's
>> ACL.
> It was the only thing that made sense, given the error, though I agree it
> seems a bit odd.
The point is you can't resolve a name like "schema_1.something" unless
you have USAGE on schema_1. So the RI-checking query, which is run as
the owner of the table, fails at parse time.
regards, tom lane
