On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:57:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Are you suggesting that it should show "index storage parameters" and > > "table storage parameters"? I'm not sure about that myself ... > > particularly considering that certain parameters might apply to some > > index AMs and not others. > > Yes, that's exactly what I was suggesting: putting all the > index-related parameters into an index bucket, without caring about > the AM involved.
+1 While reading the doc for index reloptins, I found that there is no information about the type for each index reloption in the doc. Probably it's worth adding that information, like the doc for table reloptions have. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
