On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:57:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Are you suggesting that it should show "index storage parameters" and > "table storage parameters"? I'm not sure about that myself ... > particularly considering that certain parameters might apply to some > index AMs and not others.
Yes, that's exactly what I was suggesting: putting all the index-related parameters into an index bucket, without caring about the AM involved. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
