Jamey Poirier escribió: > > Thank you Alvaro. Yes, this explains it. > It doesn't help to fix it but at least I know now that it's a known "feature". > I'll have to see about coming up with a work-around as we likely won't get to > 9.3 anytime soon.
Perhaps you can use FOR SHARE instead of FOR UPDATE in the first connection, for instance .. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
