* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Are we sure the documentation's not wrong? A quick test says this > syntax isn't accepted in *any* existing release, and I can't say I > understand what it should do anyway.
Was just composing an email to that effect, actually. I agree that it's
a documentation issue. Of course, that makes it easier to fix. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
