Good points to both. Thank you both for reviewing.

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca


On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Stefan Reiser <s.rei...@tu-braunschweig.de
> wrote:

> Kris Jurka schrieb:
>
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>  Ok, I've pushed this fix into master
>>>
>>>  You've made any failure to parse the affected row count return
>> SUCCESS_NO_INFO.  Shouldn't you change the integer parsing to a long
>> parsing and only modify the response if the value is > INT_MAX while still
>> throwing an exception if we get something that is truly undecipherable?
>>
>> Kris Jurka
>>
>>
>>  Dave,
> I'm completely unfamiliar with the driver's code, so I better won't take
> part in the further discussion -- just one thing: Now "insert_oid" won't be
> assigned correctly when the assignment of update_count fails:
>
> [QueryExecutorImpl.java]
>             try
>             {
>                 update_count = Integer.parseInt(status.**substring(1 +
> status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
>                 if (status.startsWith("INSERT"))
>                     insert_oid = Long.parseLong(status.**substring(1 +
> status.indexOf(' '),
>                                                 status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
>             }
>             catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
>             {
>                 update_count=Statement.**SUCCESS_NO_INFO;
>             }
>
> better be something like this: ?
>
>             try
>             {
>                 update_count = Integer.parseInt(status.**substring(1 +
> status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
>             }
>             catch (NumberFormatException nfe)
>             {
>                 update_count=Statement.**SUCCESS_NO_INFO;
>             }
>             try {
>                 if (status.startsWith("INSERT"))
>                     insert_oid = Long.parseLong(status.**substring(1 +
> status.indexOf(' '),
>                                                 status.lastIndexOf(' ')));
>             } catch ( ...
>                  // don't know what expected behaviour should be ...
> }
>
> regards
> Stefan Reiser
>

Reply via email to