Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> So an unsigned long won't fit inside a java long either, but hopefully it
> will never be necessary. That would be a huge number of changes.
I think we'll all be safely dead by the time anybody manages to process
2^63 rows in one PG command ;-). If you can widen the value from int to
long on the Java side, that should be sufficient.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
