* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Uh, no, because hostaddr is (required to be) a numeric IP. The odds of > it being useful in this context seem negligible.
Perhaps I was being a bit overzealous in my last response, sorry about
that. If the point here is that people who are using hostaddr are in an
environment where DNS is non-functional or actively broken, then yes,
just bombing out would probably be fine. I think the issue I have here
is that if you've gone to the trouble to set things up on the
server-side to a point where it asks the client to do Kerberos (which, I
think, must be the case if we've gotten to this point in the code), and
for some reason the client has decided to use hostaddr instead of host
(perhaps some client-side code saw a dotted-quad and thought "oh, you
must want to use hostaddr instead of host"), it shouldn't break without
a real reason.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
