Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié jun 09 21:35:57 -0400 2010: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mi\xc3\xa9 jun 09 21:10:21 -0400 > > 2010: > > > > > I think users would rather have the restore fail, and know right away > > > they have an issue, than to do the upgrade, and find out later that some > > > of their application queries fail and they need to run around fixing > > > them. (FYI, pg_upgrade would use the new pg_dump and would not fail.) > > > > I think it is quite a stretch to consider this a feature. > > How about "a desireable behavior considering the alternatives"?
I'm with Robert Haas. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
