Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mi?? jun 09 21:10:21 -0400 2010: > > > I think users would rather have the restore fail, and know right away > > they have an issue, than to do the upgrade, and find out later that some > > of their application queries fail and they need to run around fixing > > them. (FYI, pg_upgrade would use the new pg_dump and would not fail.) > > I think it is quite a stretch to consider this a feature.
How about "a desireable behavior considering the alternatives"? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
