2009/11/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Which leads to the question - do we want to back out the >>> patch, have 8.2 keep working on that, and having 8.2 fail in the few >>> unusual scenarios we have now, or do we also backpatch the requirement >>> to run on win2k or later? > >> I think the safest course is to revert the fix and keep 8.2 working on >> all platforms on which it used to work. > > +1 --- since this seems to be a corner case, desupporting old Windows > versions in a minor update doesn't seem like the thing to do.
Agreed, reverted. > Sorry for creating work for you, Magnus. No problem. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
