On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 15:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> This function call is adding the new access control entry to the DACL, >> and in Jesse's modified version it's specifying that the ACE should be >> inheritable. > > Hah, so now we have a theory. > >> The other refactoring is still important however - without it, I still >> see the error. I would guess that you cannot add an inheritable ACE >> once the process has been created, but I cannot say for certain. > > That would make sense if the state gets copied to the process at time > of creation. Okay, I'm satisfied that this is a believable patch...
From a quick look, it looks fine to me. I don't have time to do a complete check right now, but I'll do that as soon as I can and then commit it - unless people feel it's more urgent than maybe a week worst case, in which case someone else has to pick it up :-) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
